Sunday, 21 February 2016

Bertrand Russell - Founding Giant of Analytic Philosophy - Vol. 1 (Pilos Profiles)


Bertrand Russell was born in Victorian England in 1872. The son of an aristocratic and modern family, he unfortunately lost his parents at a very young age and was sent to live with his grandmother. His parents were very progressive and his mother had sexual relations with a dying scientist, purely for his own sake. The father did not mind. Later, after they had sadly died, Bertrand's grandmother found out about this and was mortified. 

Living his grandmother and assorted strange family members proved a difficult and claustrophobic environment for the young philosopher, who was not allowed to talk about his religious doubts at the dinner table, so that he carried on discussions with himself in a journal marked "Greek Exercises' so that no one would find them. There we see him wrestling with theism, and philosophizing at an already sophisticated level for such a young person. His brother taught him some geometry and he was hooked. Never did he think there could be anything so sublime. This sense of what could be achieved in mathematics profoundly influenced the young Russell's mind. He still remembered proving the pons asinorum years later.

Once he made it out to Cambridge, everything changed. He could say whatever he thought and people not only tolerated it, but encouraged him. 'Go on Bert, talk philosophy!' They said. They read Nietzsche and had exciting conversations about sex and the death of God. There was also a more moral element at Cambridge though, and G.E. Moore (defender of common sense) was at the centre of it. The young Moore was something to behold, and he greatly impressed Russell. The two would have a long and sometimes strained relationship, but they always respected each other, and together form a part of history: together they rejected the British Idealism which then dominated at Cambridge. 

While initially a Hegelian, Russell found this an intellectual straitjacket and was dismayed when he read actual Hegel and found it to 'consist mainly of puns', as he later wittily put it. Armed with a new Realist theory of mind and world which he developed together with Moore (defender of common sense, already mentioned above), they were soon to take philosophy by storm.

Russell once said to Moore that he never lied. Moore denied this, and Russell said that this was the only lie Moore had ever told. He also once asked Moore 'You don't like me do you?'. Moore paused, said no, and they went on talking about philosophy.

Image result for nietzsche












His early work was on geometry, but he was always a broad student and his first book was actually on politics. He also had a book on Liebniz. Things were happening in his personal life, and he met an American girl called Alys, from Quaker stock, whom he promptly married after kissing her on a long walk. They would write letters incessantly, and she was a teetotaler.

As the years wore on Russell became interested in mathematical logic. He was one of the first people to really appreciate Gottlob Frege, another great father of philosophy. He discovered Russell's paradox around this time: there are some things which belong to classes. There are classes which are members of themselves, such as the class of all classes of horses. But now what about the classes that contain all the classes not members of themselves? He sent this to Frege and Frege was absolutely bowled over; everything was ruined and would have to be painstakingly put back together again. But how?

Around 1910 a new figure came on the scene, full of ideas. This was Ludwig Wittgenstein, a famous philosopher in his own right. Full of ideas for how to solve the paradox, he did not think Russell's own solution, the Theory of Types, was satisfactory. Meanwhile, Russell had worked out an exciting new theory of the word 'the' which he would forever say was his greatest achievement in philosophy. Ramsey later called it a 'paradigm of philosophy'. The golden mountain does not exist. But what is this thing, the golden mountain, which doesn't exist? We seem to have a problem here. Russell suggested that what this really means is that there is a golden mountain, and that everything which i s a golden mountain is identical to that thing. Together with Whitehead they used this theory as part of a logical edifice designed to derive all of modern mathematics, in an effort to show that mathematics is logic.

Wittgenstein and Russell had a wonderful friendship before the war broke out. This is where we have to break of our story and wait until next time. Russell had a long and eventful life and one blog post is simply not enough to cover all of it.

Image result for pretty girls
Image result for pretty girls

Image result for money capeImage result for explosions

11 comments:

  1. i love how bertram leaves room in his philosophy for mystical elements even though he's such a logical thinker

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for this. Fun anecdote: an American lecturer once watched Russell board a plane - he had a bottle of whisky in his bag and revealed it to the lecturer with a wink!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Russell is often maligned these days - or rather, people acknowledge his historical prominence but don't read him and engage with him enough. It's as if we think we've absorbed all the good stuff. Engaging with his philosophy is a curious thing - there's something colorless about it all, but that's maybe what makes it so great, and we need to come alive to it again. I really don't know. Thanks for this post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is really interesting. There is a lot of new research on the horizon about Russell's philosophical inheritance; a lot of people think of him as a lapsed Hegelian, but really it's slowly becoming clear that he owes a lot to the British empiricist tradition of Locke, Hume and Mill. I'm preparing an edited volume for a press on this right now. I guess this is optimistic but we're hoping it will be out in 2019!

      Delete
    2. When I read Russell"leaves room in his philosophy for mystical elements" I thought "ooh no no no no no no no. Russell would hate that. Think of how he bemoaned the Inca kings who (at least in Russell's fictional history) sacrificed virgins. But then I remembered that he does have a connection to the Vedanta somehow or other. In and around Huxley's buddies, right? But usually I just read On Denoting.

      Delete
    3. 'he does have a connection to the Vedanta'
      Thanks for this. I am working on this right now.

      Delete
  4. I believe I have discovered independently a number of things discovered by Bertrand Russell -- or close analogues. In high school I came up with the essentially the famous tripartite analysis of sentences containing definite descriptions (I called them 'property-based names') - Russell's "Theory of Descriptions". I also developed my own conception of how a man may worship mathematics and the good things in life freely from authority. In my home country, no one had heard about these things, but when I came to South Africa I learned about Russell and was both amazed and encourage - there has to be something to these ideas.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 'Great philosophy begins with the quest for certainty in the face of doubt' - Uknown
    This is a motto Russell could have lived by all his life. He had many wives and mistresses, but he never stopped thinking about the big questions.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Whoever said that you should tell them even greater philosophy comes when you can live with doubt.

    Or, I don't know. What do you think? If it's the first I think that's sort of like saying great philosophers are just obsessives and nothing more. I'm not sure how to make a cartoon out of the second so therefore maybe it's the true one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think it's really interesting and uimportant for philosophers to define and clarify their terms.

      I agree with this idea about doubts and I'm sure wittgenstein did too.

      I think philosophers are obsessivbes but we jhave to learn more about what we mean when we say "TYruth" or "reality" etc. So the jury's basically out till we get that.

      I;m bssesssed with philosophy and think about it almost every day!

      Delete
    2. Yes! Yes! Philosophy never loses its attraction.

      I googled and found evidence of a correlation between obsessive-compulsive disorder (the Wittgenstein disease?) and risk aversion!

      Then I googled a second time and found an article that said risk averse individuals tend to be unkind! Yes. Then I googled a third time and won't tell you what I found so as not to jinx anyone reading this. (It was about employment.)

      I won't do anything else all summer till I find whether these things are true.

      Delete